Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour—insulinoma masquerading as a psychiatric illness

  1. Jnanaprakash B Karanth 1,
  2. Vishwas Pai 2 and
  3. Kiran Maribashetti 3
  1. 1 General Medicine, Shripad Hegde Institute of Medical Sciences, Sirsi, Karnataka, India
  2. 2 Oncosurgery, Shripad Hegde Institute of Medical Sciences, Sirsi, Karnataka, India
  3. 3 Internal Medicine, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Kiran Maribashetti; kmshetti.edu@gmail.com

Publication history

Accepted:06 Jun 2022
First published:14 Jun 2022
Online issue publication:14 Jun 2022

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

A female patient in her early sixties had problems of recurrent syncopal attacks and panic attacks over the last 5 years. She had been initially managed for an anxiety disorder with psychiatric medications. During one of those episodes, she was brought to our hospital in an unconscious state with a low blood sugar level of 43 mg/dL. She was suspected to have a neuroendocrine tumour and diagnosis was established by supervised fasting up to 72 hours and imaging. Her recorded blood sugar during fasting was 37 mg/dL. She underwent surgery and presently remains asymptomatic. Physicians should have a high suspicion of insulinoma in patients presenting with repeated episodes of hypoglycaemic symptoms in the absence of any cognizable cause.

Background

Functioning insulinoma, a rare form of neuroendocrine tumour with 1–4 cases per million population, is following an increasing trend facilitated by better diagnosis.1 2 Usually pancreatic in origin, these insulin-secreting tumours result in episodic hypoglycaemic attack presenting along with autonomic symptoms including tremors, anxiety and diaphoresis and neuroglycopenic symptoms including confusion, visual disturbances, abnormal behaviour and seizures.1 2

Early detection and diagnosis of insulinoma are important in determining the timely successful outcomes of management. However, diagnosis of insulinomas can be challenging given the complexity that not only the symptoms became evident during the fasting state or following exercise but may also be present as postprandial symptoms.3 4 Therefore, delays in the diagnosis of insulinoma and misdiagnosis of symptoms being attributed to psychiatric illness, rare gastrointestinal disturbances, cardiac, or neurological disorders are common.5 This impacts patient’s quality of life (QoL), and the misled diagnosis may lead to severe side effects in mismanaged cases. The diagnosis may require higher modality of PET scan, CT, MRI and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) among others.

Here, we present a case of insulinoma which was initially misdiagnosed and treated as a psychiatric illness. We report a case of insulinoma of a female patient in her early sixties, who presented with problems of recurrent syncopal attacks over the last 5 years and had been initially managed for an anxiety disorder with psychiatric medications.

Case presentation

The patient initially presented with problems of an episode of loss of consciousness while doing her household work 6 years back. The following day, the patient had an episode of convulsions with tongue bites and involuntary micturition. She was then referred to a tertiary centre in Mangalore city. A neurologist extensively examined her based on several scan reports and EEG and had referred the patient to a psychiatrist. She was started on anxiolytics and then discharged. Following this, the patient had repeated frequent episodes of pre-syncope and syncope, tremulousness and blurring of vision, palpitations. The patient had a compromised QoL with altered abnormal behavioural patterns and sensorial disturbances. She had visited several healthcare consultants at various hospitals. All the while, she was diagnosed to have anxiety and panic attacks and had been treated with antipsychiatric medications.

A year back, her daughter measured blood glucose level during one of those spells and reported it as 40 mg/dL. However, she gave oral sugar at home, patient improved and did not find that important to report to any of the doctors they were consulting. Since then, there has been an increase in her spells of such episodes and her family members considered her problems to be related to some underlying mental illness.

In May 2021, during one of those episodes, she was brought to our hospital in an unconscious state with a low blood sugar level of 43 mg/dL and treated with intravenous 25% dextrose and oral glucose. She was neither on any oral hypoglycaemic agents nor in sepsis. The following day, despite frequent oral administration of a full scoop of glucose, the patient continued to have repeated episodes of hypoglycaemia. Keeping differential diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumour, we further evaluated to confirm our diagnosis.

Investigations

Diagnosis was established by supervised fasting for upto 72 hours with lowest recorded blood sugar level of 37 mg/dL. Concurrent measurements indicated serum insulin was >140.91 (normal level fasting <25 IU/L) and serum C-peptide level was 4.50 ng/mL (normal range 0.81–3.85). The patient had all the features of Whipple’s triad, clinical diagnostic criteria for insulinoma. Accordingly, the patient’s blood sugar level was at <50 mg/dL, had symptoms of hypoglycaemia that resolved on administration of oral glucose or dextrose. EUS was suggestive of a pancreatic hypoechoic lesion (1.5×1.7 cm) in an uncinate process surrounded by vessels (image not shown). Triphasic CT abdomen was suggestive of neuroendocrine tumour. Figure 1 presents the CT findings of the lesion.

Figure 1

CT finding of lesion: 1.4×1.2 × 1.1 cm lesion posterosuperior aspect of head of pancreas.

Differential diagnosis

NA (as patient was being treated as anxiety disorder and panic disorder for more than 5 years).

Treatment

Provisionally, we diagnosed as insulinoma, a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour. The patient was started on octreotide injections (50 µg two times a day dosage). Her symptoms improved and the frequency of hypoglycaemic spells was drastically reduced. After 2 months of diagnosis, she was operated by an oncosurgeon, and pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. The surgery was successful with the size of tumour <2 cm and there was no evidence of metastasis. Her HPE report corroborated with the findings. Figure 2 presents HPE high power microscopic picture confirming our diagnosis and showing low grade neuroendocrine tumour. Our final diagnosis was a well-differentiated encapsulated grade 1 neuroendocrine tumour of the pancreas with no metastasis evident in other sections of pancreas or lymph nodes. There were no events during her intraoperative and postoperative period stay in hospital and the patient was discharged after 10 days.

Figure 2

Histopathology findings. (A) Picture showing a typical low-grade endocrine pattern of tumour. Well-formed cords and trabeculae of tumour cells surrounded by thin or compressed vascular spaces. (B) High power pictures showing monotonous cells with minimal nuclear anaplasia and abundant cytoplasm. Mitotic figures are conspicuously absent.

Outcome and follow-up

The operation was successful with no postoperative complications. During the subsequent follow-up visits until present, as of November 2021, the patient has not reported any recurrence of hypoglycaemic spells and is observed to be normal.

Discussion

In the management of insulinomas, surgery remains the first choice. Functional insulinomas are often a treatable cause of benign tumour and almost 80% of the time, they do not require additional interventions for management. However, in only cases of metastasis or ectopic insulinomas, medical management becomes essential. Early detection is the key in the management of insulinomas. In some cases, the symptoms may be associated or present as cardiac arrhythmia, syncope or seizure. One of the basics for syncope or epilepsy is to check for sugar levels.

The diagnostic procedure in cases of suspected insulinoma is based on the prolonged (72 hours) fasting test, followed by a non-invasive imaging procedure including CT and/or MRI are used to localise the source of pathological insulin secretion.6

Invasive modalities, such as EUS and Arterial calcium Stimulation with hepatic Venous Sampling demonstrate high accuracy in the preoperative localisation of insulinomas and could be superior to non-invasive localisation techniques. The appearance of insulinomas on EUS is quite characteristic, with most tumours homogeneously hypoechoic, rounded in shape, and with distinct margins and has been the preferred test in most Western centres, with reported detection rates of 86.6%–92.3%.1 7

Despite some limitations with EUS such as variable sensitivity dependent on the location and size of the tumours, relying on an experienced examiner, higher probability of missing isoechoic insulinomas, the advancements in fine-needle aspiration (FNA), enables EUS-guided FNA, a particularly reliable technique for detecting insulinomas and for staging of pancreatic tumours.

In our study, we have reported a case of insulinoma, previously misdiagnosed as a psychiatric illness. Prolonged fasting test, CT-abdomen findings and EUS procedure have facilitated the timely diagnosis, successful management of the tumour and outcome for the patient.

Patient’s perspective

I wish that the suffering and humiliation that I had to undergo should not occur with any other person. This case report should be a guiding source for all physicians to avoid misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis of rare treatable cases like insulinoma.

Learning points

  • Functioning insulinomas are rare benign treatable neuroendocrine tumours.

  • Delays in the diagnosis of insulinoma and misdiagnosis attributes symptoms to psychiatric illness, rarely gastrointestinal disturbances, cardiac or neurological disorders.

  • Physicians should have a high suspicion of insulinoma in patients presenting with repeated episodes of hypoglycaemic symptoms in the absence of any cognizable cause.

  • Surgical resection of tumour after localisation is treatment of choice with successful outcomes for benign tumours.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Footnotes

  • Contributors JBK interviewed and wrote the case report. VP and KM contributed, reviewed and finalised the case report.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer